Would be shocked if 9 wins = play in game. Historically 8 wins avoids the play in game with one or two exceptions.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Game 22--@ Loyola
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by GonzoCat View Post
I reviewed it because the announcers called it a 3 but the score only went up 2. It should have been a 3. He jumped from behind the line and landed on the line.
I would assume that we had an assistant coach who went after this. We should have guys on the bench whose job includes keeping an eye on the clock, score, fouls, etc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by panther91 View PostWould be shocked if 9 wins = play in game. Historically 8 wins avoids the play in game with one or two exceptions.
9 wins=13% chance of PIG
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by sivert View Post
I just went by Hacksaw's math... http://mvcfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5194&start=10
9 wins=13% chance of PIG
- Likes 1
Comment
-
We had them. The guys have to leave this game knowing they can beat anyone in the conference.
I love Coach Jake, but I've never figured out the whole don't sub during the last 10 minutes. I totally get if we get down big and a group of five makes a big run and gets us back in it - go for it. However, I think Loyola got two offensive rebounds during the last couple of minutes of the game that would have been huge. Fresh is better. I really like Berhow's game. My guess is he has to be leading the team in rebounds this season. Would like to see him play more in the second half. Even with 3 fouls. Pickford is also a heck of a rebounder. Get those guys in on defense at the end of the game. Dahl wouldn't hurt either. Anyone actually know if he has a health issue that limits his minutes? It appears like he's not allowed to play over 10 minutes. Hopefully we are just saving him for a tourney run. I think Luke for the most part played really well. Even a two minute break at the end may have helped him. I have no problem with him shooting 3's. He has to be around 50% and only takes it if he's wide open.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sivert View PostI would be interested in an Offensive efficiency and Defensive efficiency analysis for JD-v-Krutwig and Luke-v-Krutwig.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Neighbor View Postby my calculations utilizing the box score play by play, Krutwig scored 20 on McDonnell (3 free throw & one 3pt') and 2 points on JD.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wxcpanther View Post
That doesn't necessarily tell the whole story though, the majority of JD's minutes weren't against Krutwig, so really it's possible the comp of points per possession isn't too far off#MACtion
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wxcpanther View Post
That doesn't necessarily tell the whole story though, the majority of JD's minutes weren't against Krutwig, so really it's possible the comp of points per possession isn't too far off
2 points on 7:32 JD in at the same time.
But this could go on for ever. You're right it doesn't tell the whole story. This isn't wrestling. It's a team sport.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Neighbor View Postby my calculations utilizing the box score play by play, Krutwig scored 20 on McDonnell (3 free throw & one 3pt') and 2 points on JD.
Comment
-
Jake plays Dahl until he a) commits a foul, b) commits a turnover, or c) misses a shot, then he pulls him, usually for the rest of the game. Obviously no other player is held to that standard or we wouldn't be able to put 5 on the floor after the first 10 minutes. I don't know what his deal is, but I'm starting to buy into Mudra's theories. If the opponent has a true 5 we have no chance to stop them or score in the paint besides Dahl.GO PANTHERS!
Comment
-
Originally posted by GonzoCat View PostIf the opponent has a true 5 we have no chance to stop them or score in the paint besides Dahl.
Comment
Comment