Re: Iowa State gets paid to lose
Two years does not a powerhouse make.
That'd be akin to Iowa fans claiming that the football team was a "powerhouse" during their run of 4 January bowls in 4 years. A good run, but a powerhouse? I guess I reserve that word for programs who traditionally put out amazing product - and very, very rarely have an "off" season. In men's bball, Kansas, Duke, UNC, etc. all come to mind. Iowa State does not.
Heck, "ISU has never been a traditional power in football" might be the biggest understatement in history. They've never put together more than an above-average team in 100+ years - let alone a run to even mention the word "powerhouse" in the same sentence as them.
Originally posted by UNIFanSince1983
View Post
That'd be akin to Iowa fans claiming that the football team was a "powerhouse" during their run of 4 January bowls in 4 years. A good run, but a powerhouse? I guess I reserve that word for programs who traditionally put out amazing product - and very, very rarely have an "off" season. In men's bball, Kansas, Duke, UNC, etc. all come to mind. Iowa State does not.
Heck, "ISU has never been a traditional power in football" might be the biggest understatement in history. They've never put together more than an above-average team in 100+ years - let alone a run to even mention the word "powerhouse" in the same sentence as them.


Comment