considering move to FBS
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Appalachian State
Collapse
X
-
Re: Appalachian State
Didn't UNI do a "feasibility study of a move to the FBS" along with the whole study of the feasibility of athletics in general a month or two ago?
I'm pretty sure Montana and even Texas State are also exploring the option, in case the WAC decides to expand after losing some of their current members to the FBS conference shuffle.
-
Re: Appalachian State
Reports are that the WAC met with Montana earlier this week, along with several other schools. Notably, Montana was the only FCS on the list.
I think a lot of schools, all in budget crunches, are at least considering the notion. I'm quite confident that most will decide to stay home.
I still think the long-term future of college football may be 4-6 "super conferences" out of FBS saying in some kind of BCS/playoff system, with the rest (MAC, WAC, Sun Belt, etc) joining us back in a much larger subdivision.
Comment
-
Re: Appalachian State
Montana is gone, App State will be for the right conference.Selling a lot of old UNI stuff here: http://www.panthernation.com/showthread.php?t=65762
Comment
-
Re: Appalachian State
Isn't there still a moratorium on moving to FBS?If computers ruled college basketball the way they do football, we'd have skipped all this March Madness monotony and just waited a month for the Kansas-Kentucky title game. And watched Northern Iowa play Cornell in the Poulan Weedeater Bowl. ~ Dwight Perry The Seattle Times
Comment
-
Re: Appalachian State
It's almost up.Originally posted by UNIAlum95 View PostIsn't there still a moratorium on moving to FBS?
I'd say App State is gone if CUSA or higher offers.
I think Montana to the WAC is almost a done deal.
Texas State and UTSA are gone if someone, anyone will take them.
Depending on shifts we might see more go. I don't know if Montana State tries to follow Montana. Georgiea Southern might try to follow App State.Selling a lot of old UNI stuff here: http://www.panthernation.com/showthread.php?t=65762
Comment
-
Re: Appalachian State
And I agree completely. Not that that's a bad thing... let everyone get what they deserve, and I don't mean that to be a jerk. I personally think it'd be really cool to have MAC and Sun Belt teams come to the Dome on occasion. It'd certainly make scheduling non-conference easier.Originally posted by Newsbreaker View PostReports are that the WAC met with Montana earlier this week, along with several other schools. Notably, Montana was the only FCS on the list.
I think a lot of schools, all in budget crunches, are at least considering the notion. I'm quite confident that most will decide to stay home.
I still think the long-term future of college football may be 4-6 "super conferences" out of FBS saying in some kind of BCS/playoff system, with the rest (MAC, WAC, Sun Belt, etc) joining us back in a much larger subdivision.
"Once it starts, it never ends."
-Eldon Miller
Comment
-
Re: Appalachian State
Out of all the FCS schools Montana and App State have the best chance of making a successful FBS transition. Both have a very strong following and top notch facilities.Originally posted by TH1974This guy was all-UNI, and wanted to show it by pretending to play a non-existant musical instrument in public.
Comment
-
Re: Appalachian State
Montana would have the best chance I think... I'm envious of the money they make on Football.Originally posted by Kyle View PostOut of all the FCS schools Montana and App State have the best chance of making a successful FBS transition. Both have a very strong following and top notch facilities."I think they're very good," Farley said of the preseason top 25 Hawkeyes. "But so are we."
Comment
-
Re: Appalachian State
I don't think they "make" any money on football. They pretty much break even.Originally posted by ubuntuCAT View PostMontana would have the best chance I think... I'm envious of the money they make on Football.
And the rest of their athletic department is crap.UNI FIGHT
Originally posted by 9YRPLANiowa sucks, fran sucks, their schedule sucks, iowa fans suck
Comment
-
Re: Appalachian State
Montana could be successful. App State? My bet is they become the next Marshall. I don't say that because I think they're not a good program but rather they're in a state and region with much higher-profile teams. Montana benefits from being the big dogs in the state, not unlike Boise State.Originally posted by Kyle View PostOut of all the FCS schools Montana and App State have the best chance of making a successful FBS transition. Both have a very strong following and top notch facilities.
Comment
-
Re: Appalachian State
The supposed letter from their AD stated that the income and expenses for football were roughly $6.2M, thus breakeven.Originally posted by Panther-Sheik View PostHow could they not make money at football when their ticket revenue is $4.2MM?If computers ruled college basketball the way they do football, we'd have skipped all this March Madness monotony and just waited a month for the Kansas-Kentucky title game. And watched Northern Iowa play Cornell in the Poulan Weedeater Bowl. ~ Dwight Perry The Seattle Times
Comment
-
Re: Appalachian State
I understand that, but still wonder how you don't make money when you have ticket revenue that is so high. Is that just an accounting thing so that they don't look profitable? Maybe that helps them continue to secure the level of state funding?Originally posted by UNIAlum95 View PostThe supposed letter from their AD stated that the income and expenses for football were roughly $6.2M, thus breakeven.
Comment
-
Re: Appalachian State
I don't get it either. Isn't UNI's total Football budget around $3 Million?Originally posted by Panther-Sheik View PostI understand that, but still wonder how you don't make money when you have ticket revenue that is so high. Is that just an accounting thing so that they don't look profitable? Maybe that helps them continue to secure the level of state funding?"I think they're very good," Farley said of the preseason top 25 Hawkeyes. "But so are we."
Comment




Comment