WWW.PANTHERNATION.COM
GO PANTHERS!
welcome

Welcome to the best UNI Panther forum on the net!

Become a PN Supporting Member! Get exclusive access to the Panther Den forum and more. Click here for info.

30-minute show exclusively highlighting UNI Athletics. Click here for info.

  • You need to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
  • To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the help page by clicking this link.
  • If you have any questions please use the Contact Us form.
This website is not affiliated with the University of Northern Iowa or the UNI Panther Athletic Program.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

    Originally posted by Silent Earl View Post
    Now that the two games on btn featuring UNI are over I could care less about watching that network for the rest of the year. If it meant raising my bill 50 cents a month I'm glad Dish held out against it. This is just one of the ways that all of us, fans or not, are paying the $4 million dollar coaches salaries and other insane expenses of the BCS league schools.
    I can't blame DISH entirely for this dispute. BTN is asking too much. The B1G is not "back" as they say, and very few people care about watching the games outside of the Midwest. Yet B1G Network insists on DISH broadcasting it nationwide.

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

      Originally posted by Mountain Panther View Post
      I can't blame DISH entirely for this dispute. BTN is asking too much. The B1G is not "back" as they say, and very few people care about watching the games outside of the Midwest. Yet B1G Network insists on DISH broadcasting it nationwide.
      Very few are about watching anything, comparatively speaking.

      BTN is a popular channel, and a market rate has been established. DISH is positioning themselves as the budget alternative to cable and DTV, and it's going to mean poorer content on that service.

      Everybody is "wrong" in a certain sense, but compared to other providers, it's DISH that is being unreasonable.

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

        Someday some provider is going to offer a menu of channels with pricing disclosed for each one and every subscriber can pick and pay for just the 25 channels they actually want and not hundreds of channels they don't want. I realize most of those channels are thrown in for "free" by the networks in a package deal, but nothing is really free. The technology to do this is certainly there, has been for a while. If subscribers knew just how much they were paying for each channel, and all the associated channels they don't want if that model were continued, they would be free to make an informed choice.

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

          Originally posted by Silent Earl View Post
          Someday some provider is going to offer a menu of channels with pricing disclosed for each one and every subscriber can pick and pay for just the 25 channels they actually want and not hundreds of channels they don't want. I realize most of those channels are thrown in for "free" by the networks in a package deal, but nothing is really free. The technology to do this is certainly there, has been for a while. If subscribers knew just how much they were paying for each channel, and all the associated channels they don't want if that model were continued, they would be free to make an informed choice.
          And no one is going to save any money. You'll be paying nearly the same amount for 1/4 the channels. Ala Carte is a pipe dream.
          UNI isn't exactly splitting atoms in terms of academics. -run&blade

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

            Originally posted by Silent Earl View Post
            Someday some provider is going to offer a menu of channels with pricing disclosed for each one and every subscriber can pick and pay for just the 25 channels they actually want and not hundreds of channels they don't want. I realize most of those channels are thrown in for "free" by the networks in a package deal, but nothing is really free. The technology to do this is certainly there, has been for a while. If subscribers knew just how much they were paying for each channel, and all the associated channels they don't want if that model were continued, they would be free to make an informed choice.
            The technology is there. But I'm guessing the networks/statioins have no interest in allowing that to happen. They make money off of being included in the standard package. Hence why BTN doesn't want to allow providers to relegate them to a sports package.

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

              Originally posted by TH1974 View Post
              And no one is going to save any money. You'll be paying nearly the same amount for 1/4 the channels. Ala Carte is a pipe dream.
              I get what your saying but "nearly the same" sounds like "less than I'm paying now" and if it's the 1/4 of the channels I actually watch, who cares?
              "I think they're very good," Farley said of the preseason top 25 Hawkeyes. "But so are we."

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

                Not you, apparently. Either way, it won't happen.
                UNI isn't exactly splitting atoms in terms of academics. -run&blade

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

                  the big ten should be paying people to put their dog**** conference on tv this year.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

                    Originally posted by 9YRPLAN View Post
                    the big ten should be paying people to put their dog**** conference on tv this year.
                    06panther has a new quote to add to his signature.
                    Originally posted by TH1974
                    This guy was all-UNI, and wanted to show it by pretending to play a non-existant musical instrument in public.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

                      You will pay more for ala carte pricing and get much less. It only sounds better if you don't understand the economics.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

                        Originally posted by Newsbreaker View Post
                        You will pay more for ala carte pricing and get much less. It only sounds better if you don't understand the economics.
                        ^this is 100% accurate. Your most expensive channels are sports

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

                          Originally posted by jnutt View Post
                          ^this is 100% accurate. Your most expensive channels are sports
                          So if you didn't want sports channels you would likely pay less?
                          "I think they're very good," Farley said of the preseason top 25 Hawkeyes. "But so are we."

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

                            Originally posted by ubuntuCAT View Post
                            So if you didn't want sports channels you would likely pay less?
                            yes, but then again it's owned by Disney so they may make you buy it if you want ABC or the Disney channel. They are sneaky bastards

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

                              Ala Carte won't work. I'm going to oversimplify it, but lets say there are 200 channels out there. Well, that's nice, but those 200 channels are actually owned by about 5 companies.

                              So you're Mediacom, or Dish, or whatever and you want ESPN? Well that's owned by Disney and they are also going to make you to offer 30 other crap channels that your customers may or may not want. Until that changes, I don't see much movement on ala carte.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: Dish Network/ Big Ten Network dispute

                                So basically there's no competition. It's all controlled by legalized organized crime and your choices as a consumer are 1) Take the 200 channel $150 a month "basic" package or 2) Get a set of rabbit ears and try to pick up your local stations.

                                You know, you kids probably won't believe this, but there was a time when there were actual laws against monopolies in this country.

                                Ala carte is the answer and it will come about someday, it's just a question of when. You would need a return to enforcement of anti-trust rules, and we are still moving in the opposite direction from that, but this too shall pass.
                                Last edited by Silent Earl; 09-17-2012, 06:39 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X