I have a couple of things I need to get off of my chest. Perhaps I'm just missing something here, but these are really bugging me.
1. During today's Montana/Iowa game, Gary Dolphin kept singing the praises of the Montana program and their success in 1-AA. I have no problem with that because Montana has had a great run for the last decade plus. However, they also kept making references to the fact that Montana has 9 D-1 transfers on their team. From what I could tell, Iowa has 85 D-1 players on their team!! Sure, it helps Montana's team to have that many D-1 players transfer to their program, but is it worth them making such a fuss??
2. I have a lot of respect for Drake University. I have high respect for their academic standards and appreciate how they do not bend the academic rules for their athletes. However, the thing that has bugged me for some time now is how Drake and the local media here in Des Moines continues to remind everyone that they are a non-scholarship 1-AA team. In the Register after the UNI game, Phadavong (sp??) even was quoted making a comment about going up against a 'fully-funded program' in UNI. It always makes it sound like a built-in excuse for why they may lose. The Ivy League schools do not give out scholarships. I don't recall hearing the 'non-scholarship' title being thrown around during Colgate's deep run into the playoffs a couple of years ago. If you play 1-AA ball, you are a 1-AA team. The decision to offer scholarships should be based on the school and/or conference. Also, having different polls for 1-AA and 1-AA Non-Scholarship teams seems to cheapen the 1-AA title. I believe Drake was ranked #1 in 1-AA Non-Scholarship last year before they came to the Dome. Enough said.
Sorry for such a long post.
Just had to get this off of my chest!! I'd be interested in any other perspectives the Panther Nation may have on these subjects.
1. During today's Montana/Iowa game, Gary Dolphin kept singing the praises of the Montana program and their success in 1-AA. I have no problem with that because Montana has had a great run for the last decade plus. However, they also kept making references to the fact that Montana has 9 D-1 transfers on their team. From what I could tell, Iowa has 85 D-1 players on their team!! Sure, it helps Montana's team to have that many D-1 players transfer to their program, but is it worth them making such a fuss??
2. I have a lot of respect for Drake University. I have high respect for their academic standards and appreciate how they do not bend the academic rules for their athletes. However, the thing that has bugged me for some time now is how Drake and the local media here in Des Moines continues to remind everyone that they are a non-scholarship 1-AA team. In the Register after the UNI game, Phadavong (sp??) even was quoted making a comment about going up against a 'fully-funded program' in UNI. It always makes it sound like a built-in excuse for why they may lose. The Ivy League schools do not give out scholarships. I don't recall hearing the 'non-scholarship' title being thrown around during Colgate's deep run into the playoffs a couple of years ago. If you play 1-AA ball, you are a 1-AA team. The decision to offer scholarships should be based on the school and/or conference. Also, having different polls for 1-AA and 1-AA Non-Scholarship teams seems to cheapen the 1-AA title. I believe Drake was ranked #1 in 1-AA Non-Scholarship last year before they came to the Dome. Enough said.
Sorry for such a long post.
Just had to get this off of my chest!! I'd be interested in any other perspectives the Panther Nation may have on these subjects.





Comment