WWW.PANTHERNATION.COM
GO PANTHERS!
welcome

Welcome to the best UNI Panther forum on the net!

Become a PN Supporting Member! Get exclusive access to the Panther Den forum and more. Click here for info.

30-minute show exclusively highlighting UNI Athletics. Click here for info.

  • You need to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
  • To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the help page by clicking this link.
  • If you have any questions please use the Contact Us form.
This website is not affiliated with the University of Northern Iowa or the UNI Panther Athletic Program.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The last 11 seconds

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I think a safe rollout pass/run option would have been better. The chances of Sanders throwing an INT would be pretty slim. There was 2:34 on the clock. If we get a first down, ISU calls their last timeout. From that point ISU couldn't have stopped the clock and we could've even taken a knee (or run three running plays up the gut) 3 times running the clock down to about :30 and kicked the FG, going up by 6.
    Fact is, if we get a first down, the game for all practical purposes is over.

    Once again, I have too much respect for the coaching staff to complain though. What a great effort and great gameplan.

    They have the ability to run the table although I think the SIU game will be a *****.
    Let's have a great turnout Saturday and spank TA!
    "Give a cheer Ho, the purple and the gold!!"

    Comment


    • #17
      What if's can be fun, but UNI played a pretty solid game. ISU has a lot more what if's.

      Comment


      • #18
        Yeah, we definently should have rolled Sanders out on the 3rd and 4 play. It was the same exact play that we ran before that got stuffed for a two yard loss. You take a shot to get the TD or at least the first down there or if all else fails throw it away and get the three points, but we really needed to put that in the endzone to put the game away, but that's not how it worked. I hope that the team plays well in the Gateway and this isn't a downfall for the rest of the season. Let's go get them Panthers!!!
        Coach Whisenhunt 1/18/09. "There was never any complaints about not being named the starter, all he wanted was an opportunity and he took advantage of it. Kurt is probably one of the greatest individuals you'll ever meet. Kurt worked hard on a lot of things that a lot of times older quarterbacks aren't willing to do. That's a credit to his humility and his competitive drive, and the reason that we are here today in great part is what Kurt Warner has done for us."

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Blue42 View Post
          I agree with UNI92 on this one. I would've liked to see us go for the 1st down there. If we get the 1st down, we can pretty much run out the clock. If not, ISU still has to go the length of the field. A field goal would then tie us, but ISU's kicking game is not exactly rock solid.

          The field goal only put us up by 6, and then required us to kick off giving ISU a chance for better field position.

          With ISU's defense on their heels, and a chance for us to win the game on one play, I'd take the shot on 4th and 2 to end it.

          But overall, an awesome job by UNI's staff in getting the team ready for this game and keeping ISU off balance for most the game.
          Ditto!!! Plus, another down would have taken more time off the clock and ISU would have needed only a field goal to tie. With no timeouts left and having to go the length of the football field I would like to have seen them go for a field goal instead. Several of us were surprised UNI settled for the field goal.

          Comment

          Working...
          X