Re: Looks like we are totally screwed in Dsm again today?
I don't think this is "totally" fair. I don't think there were multiple outlets beating down the door or entering into a bidding war this past off-season. I think UNI needs to do a better job, yes, but I also think we have to understand that these baby steps are at least steps. Now it has to be taken to the next level in the coming years. The best way to do that is for people to let Mediacom and their local radio / tv stations know about the demand for the UNI product.
Originally posted by Newsbreaker
View Post




), but I don't think the University is broadcasting anything... and cost is definitely more than a dollar. I'm not a broadcasting "guy" by any stretch, but I believe that UNI sold / awarded a broadcasting contract to an organization (KWWL) to carry their games. KWWL would now then be responsible for production and distribution of those games...not UNI. What I was trying to say is that this past year I don't think ESPN was beating down the door to win the UNI t.v. contract...or even someone lesser (i.e. Sinclair who renegged on their deal last year, didn't they?). I also doubt that a single DSM t.v. station made any kind of bid (although I have no way of knowing that for sure). KWWL did want the rights and was awarded as a result. I have no idea of the monetary details of that award, but I would have to assume there was some form of compensation to the university. But, had there been a company out there that wanted to show 100% of UNI games to 100% of the markets, I'm sure it would have been looked at very hard and probably awarded. But the university had to make a decision from a limited pool of possibilities on whether they wanted to award a contract to a group that agreed to televise 8 games this season, or forego that group for a "Sinclair" that might want the UNI v. Iowa game and nothing else. Is it better to have 8 local / regional games televised or one statewide game? I don't know, but the university made the decision to go with more games is my assumption. Once you have awarded a contract, the ship has sailed for that year or the term of that contract. I have no idea if KWWL tries to sell their broadcasts or how that might work at all, but if no one down in DSM wants to buy the games it is a moot point anyway. And remember, last year we had a deal to broadcast games on a wider scale and the company backed out midstream. The result was that no more games were seen by anyone in any market (unless in person). I just wonder if ALL the blame is being incorrectly thrown at the university and the athletic department when it has more to do with known demand for the product in a particular market...this case DSM.
Comment