WWW.PANTHERNATION.COM
GO PANTHERS!
welcome

Welcome to the best UNI Panther forum on the net!

Become a PN Supporting Member! Get exclusive access to the Panther Den forum and more. Click here for info.

30-minute show exclusively highlighting UNI Athletics. Click here for info.

  • You need to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
  • To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the help page by clicking this link.
  • If you have any questions please use the Contact Us form.
This website is not affiliated with the University of Northern Iowa or the UNI Panther Athletic Program.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

    Really interesting article about changing the selection process. Worth a read.



    Also, he believes we should be the top 3 seed.

  • #2
    Re: Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

    He put Rhode Island in twice. Still like the article, though.
    Give us a yell, HO! The purple and the gold
    Victory for U-N-I!

    Find out what the other team wants to do, then take it away from them.
    - George Halas

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

      This is a start. But if low and mid majors want to make even more noise, then they need to seriously start considering sending their regular season champs to the dance. You're drastically reducing your chances of pulling off a major upset in the Big Dance if you sent your 5th-best team to be the sacrificial lamb of a 1 seed, or, worse yet, to lose in Dayton to another 16. All for what? Two hours showing your half empty stadium on ESPN2 with the hope of grabbing a .2 rating (yes, these games hover around that mark)?

      The exposure 14 & 15 seeds get when they pull the upset is astronomical. Imagine a stronger 16?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

        Very interesting. As I was reading, I didn't like the idea at first, but after thinking about it, I do like it.
        To avoid confusion - my username is baseball (Cy Young award) related, NOT for the Cyclones.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

          I like it

          kaboom
          "I think they're very good," Farley said of the preseason top 25 Hawkeyes. "But so are we."

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

            Originally posted by UNI MadCat View Post
            This is a start. But if low and mid majors want to make even more noise, then they need to seriously start considering sending their regular season champs to the dance. You're drastically reducing your chances of pulling off a major upset in the Big Dance if you sent your 5th-best team to be the sacrificial lamb of a 1 seed, or, worse yet, to lose in Dayton to another 16. All for what? Two hours showing your half empty stadium on ESPN2 with the hope of grabbing a .2 rating (yes, these games hover around that mark)?

            The exposure 14 & 15 seeds get when they pull the upset is astronomical. Imagine a stronger 16?
            I've always thought that regular-season champs should get the auto bids. It would take the drama away from the conference tournaments, but it's more fair.
            UNI isn't exactly splitting atoms in terms of academics. -run&blade

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

              Not a bad idea at all.
              "And immediately, (P'Allen Stinnett's) Facebook status was spouting vulgarities towards the university."

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

                The NCAA Tournament is most popular sporting event outside the Super Bowl. Let's not muck it up.
                Originally posted by TH1974
                This guy was all-UNI, and wanted to show it by pretending to play a non-existant musical instrument in public.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

                  If they did this what would the incentive be for some teams to play their best players and risk injury. UNI and Wichita and most P5 teams wouldn't need to play their players and a team like Illinois St or Kansas St would have a better chance at winning the conference tournament and getting an auto bid.

                  A different idea would be to award regular season champs auto bids, get rid of the conference tournaments, and give teams 2 more games to play. They could sent up 1 day events like bracket busters where a P5 team would play a mid major home and away. They could wait to set up the match ups as the season goes along to set up some great games.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

                    Originally posted by TH1974 View Post
                    I've always thought that regular-season champs should get the auto bids. It would take the drama away from the conference tournaments, but it's more fair.
                    They do get auto bids.......to the NIT.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

                      If the league tournaments were viewed for what they are - first rounds of a true national tournament.

                      Nobody thinks of it that way though. I'm not sure his system wouldn't be better.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        How about simply changing the RPI to award more for nonconference away games (not at neutral court)?

                        From my NSA monitored nexus 5

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

                          Originally posted by TheMacHouse View Post
                          If they did this what would the incentive be for some teams to play their best players and risk injury. UNI and Wichita and most P5 teams wouldn't need to play their players and a team like Illinois St or Kansas St would have a better chance at winning the conference tournament and getting an auto bid.

                          A different idea would be to award regular season champs auto bids, get rid of the conference tournaments, and give teams 2 more games to play. They could sent up 1 day events like bracket busters where a P5 team would play a mid major home and away. They could wait to set up the match ups as the season goes along to set up some great games.
                          Me likey. Iowa State vs. UNI to end the regular season.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

                            Outside of his crusade to pay college athletes, there isn't much I disagree with Bilas about. These are good ideas. He makes a great point that if you are a P5 school you have ample opportunity to prove yourself during conference play. They shouldn't get a do over to try and make the field. If these P5 schools are going to play horseshat non-conference schedules and rely on their conference games, they should only be judged thru the regular season. If they don't like it, go play someone.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Bilas on NCAA Tournament Changes

                              Originally posted by Newsbreaker View Post
                              If the league tournaments were viewed for what they are - first rounds of a true national tournament.
                              are you saying that only the conference tournament winners should advance to the NCAA tournament, no at-large bids?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X