WWW.PANTHERNATION.COM
GO PANTHERS!
welcome

Welcome to the best UNI Panther forum on the net!

Become a PN Supporting Member! Get exclusive access to the Panther Den forum and more. Click here for info.

30-minute show exclusively highlighting UNI Athletics. Click here for info.

  • You need to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
  • To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the help page by clicking this link.
  • If you have any questions please use the Contact Us form.
This website is not affiliated with the University of Northern Iowa or the UNI Panther Athletic Program.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Possible FB rule changes for 2012

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Possible FB rule changes for 2012

    If it as about saftey the game needs to follow these rules.


    1. All players, regardless of position must start within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage, as by defensive backs starting 10 yards off the ball can gain too much speed running towards the LOS to make a stop on a run play. WR can not be more than 10 yards off the end of the LOS, as any more distance from the end of the LOS gives them too much speed built up on crack blocks.
    ---Addendum - Defensive players can start more than 5 yards from the LOS, however, they are not allowed to get within 5 yards of the LOS at any time due to too much run up speed.

    2. Lineman are no longer allowed to start in a 3 or 4 point stance. All lineman must start standing up. There is no longer a snap, as that takes the centers attention off the defensive line and could lead to someone hitting him he isn't expecting. The QB will start with the ball in his hand and slap it to simulate the snap - Ala elementary 2 hand touch football at recess. Cut blocks result in automatic expulsion from the game, and a 400 game suspension.

    3. No more tackling....can't use 2 hand touch or flags either because a persons fingers could get stuck in material and break. A player is now down when the other team has 2 players close enough to touch him.

    4. No more pads. Pads give a false sense of safety. In stead players will be wearing BMX style helmets to completely cover their face from inury. The rest of the uniform will be made of a combination of bubble wrap and packing peanuts.

    4. No more kick offs. The ball will automatically be place at the 40 yard line. The 40 yard line was chosen because the more yards a team has to go, the more plays they will run, the more chances for injury.

    5. Punts are now just the punter and the returner. The punter will stand 15 yards behind the LOS and kick to the returner. The returner is automatically down when he catches the ball.

    6. Field goals will be just the field goal kicker and 2 defenders wearing extra padding to protect themselves from the ball if it should hit them. The holder is no longer involved because he could be accidentally kicked. The defenders will stand at the LOS and jump to block the ball - no rush. The kicker will kick the ball 7 yards from the LOS.

    7. WR are down where the catch the ball, they could pull a muscle running.

    8. To add to number 7, no running....not even fast walking. Normal speed walking. Running leads to too many possible injuries.



    Did I miss anything?

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Possible FB rule changes for 2012

      Back in the late 1800s, football was almost banned because a couple players used to die every year (usually from head injuries).

      Boxing used to be an NCAA-sanctioned sport until the death of Charlie Mohr back in 1960. Heck, boxing used to be a lot more socially acceptable.

      Football is a violent sport. The research that is building around head injuries and concussions is pretty dramatic stuff -- I don't think some of you people appreciate the liability to the colleges if they continue to sanction the sport as it is played now.

      It isn't the "wussification" of football -- it's recognizing the reality of what those hits can do to a person and trying to make the sport safer.

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Possible FB rule changes for 2012

        with all the talk about concussions in sports and everything, I'm surprised boxing is even still around. since that "sport" is pretty much centered around two people trying to concuss each other.

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Possible FB rule changes for 2012

          Originally posted by Big_Al View Post
          Back in the late 1800s, football was almost banned because a couple players used to die every year (usually from head injuries).

          Boxing used to be an NCAA-sanctioned sport until the death of Charlie Mohr back in 1960. Heck, boxing used to be a lot more socially acceptable.

          Football is a violent sport. The research that is building around head injuries and concussions is pretty dramatic stuff -- I don't think some of you people appreciate the liability to the colleges if they continue to sanction the sport as it is played now.

          It isn't the "wussification" of football -- it's recognizing the reality of what those hits can do to a person and trying to make the sport safer.
          I'm fully aware of the risks of football....so do players. I've had three concussions from playing football, I'm well aware of the short and long term effects of them.


          However, football is inherently dangerous. No matter what rules they try to put in place there will always be concussions....or the country will eventually move to rugby....where there is no pads of any kind.

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Possible FB rule changes for 2012

            Eleven players is waaaaay too many. Cut it back to 8.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Possible FB rule changes for 2012

              Looks like all the proposed changes were approved and will take effect in the 2012 season.



              This article also clarifies that the touchbacks being moved to the 25 only applies on free kicks, not on punts, interceptions in the endzone etc.

              There are also changes to volleyball, it appears, including increasing the substitution limit to from 12 to 15 per set.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Possible FB rule changes for 2012

                Is the kickoff classified as a free kick?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Possible FB rule changes for 2012

                  Originally posted by JayJ79 View Post
                  Looks like all the proposed changes were approved and will take effect in the 2012 season.



                  This article also clarifies that the touchbacks being moved to the 25 only applies on free kicks, not on punts, interceptions in the endzone etc.

                  There are also changes to volleyball, it appears, including increasing the substitution limit to from 12 to 15 per set.
                  BTW, I'm pretty upset about the changes made to Women's Bowling. Can you believe that they're requiring a four-inch inseam? Isn't three inches good enough for them!?!?!?!??!!?!?!?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Possible FB rule changes for 2012

                    Originally posted by Codytwo View Post
                    Is the kickoff classified as a free kick?
                    yes, kickoffs are free kicks, as are kicks after safeties.

                    The other type of kick is a scrimmage kick, like punts, FG attempts, and Point-after-touchdown attempts.

                    The only one I'm not sure about is the rarely-used FG attempt immediately after a fair catch. For some reason I think that may be a free kick as well, but I've never seen it, so it could be a scrimmage kick.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Possible FB rule changes for 2012

                      Originally posted by JayJ79 View Post
                      yes, kickoffs are free kicks, as are kicks after safeties.

                      The other type of kick is a scrimmage kick, like punts, FG attempts, and Point-after-touchdown attempts.

                      The only one I'm not sure about is the rarely-used FG attempt immediately after a fair catch. For some reason I think that may be a free kick as well, but I've never seen it, so it could be a scrimmage kick.
                      I've seen it used once, but I don't remember how it works. I think the announcers did refer to it as a free kick though.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Possible FB rule changes for 2012

                        Originally posted by Codytwo View Post
                        I've seen it used once, but I don't remember how it works. I think the announcers did refer to it as a free kick though.
                        if the defending team has the possibility of blocking it, then it is a scrimmage kick. otherwise, it is a free kick

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X