WWW.PANTHERNATION.COM
GO PANTHERS!
welcome

Welcome to the best UNI Panther forum on the net!

Become a PN Supporting Member! Get exclusive access to the Panther Den forum and more. Click here for info.

30-minute show exclusively highlighting UNI Athletics. Click here for info.

  • You need to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
  • To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the help page by clicking this link.
  • If you have any questions please use the Contact Us form.
This website is not affiliated with the University of Northern Iowa or the UNI Panther Athletic Program.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Full Cost of Attendance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Full Cost of Attendance

    I understand recognition on a modified accrual basis, measurement focus, and means of spending and control. Fund balance reserve is a portion of fund equity that must be segregated for some future use and is not available for future appropriation. The reserve is not a liability, it is a reservation of fund balance. This has a few similarities to appropriation of retained earnings in an enterprise. If a portion of the fund balance is designated as reserved, the fund balance should be reported as unreserved fund balance. The restricted current funds is utilized by colleges to account for resources that are to be spent for current operating purposes. The unrestricted fund accounts for all currently expendable resources that are to be used in primary objectives of the institution such as research. Restricted current funds are special purpose federal grants and private donations for a specific purpose. Restricted current funds are externally restricted because donors or outside parties determine how the resources are used. Current funds revenues include tuition, governmental appropriations and grants, private gifts and grants, endowment income, sales and services of educational departments and auxiliary enterprises, and expired term endowments. Current funds revenues are reduced by refunds; scholarships and tuition remissions are included in revenues and offset by expenditures. Endowment funds are similar to the nonexpendable trust funds in state and local governments. The university would have to keep the principal of the gifts in tact. The earnings from the investment of the principal will be expended for current restricted or unrestricted purposes, depending on the wishes of the donor. If expended for current restricted purposes, the resources are transferred to the Current funds-Restricted group and expenditures are made according to donor restrictions. All income earned for current purposes is recognized as endowment income. Term endowments are like endowment funds except that the principal may be spent after a period of time following the occurrence of an event. Quasi endowment records unrestricted monetary balances that have been voluntarily been set aside by the university rather than applied to current operations. Annuity funds consist of funds acquired by the institution subject to agreements where the assets are made available to the school with the condition the institution binds itself to pay stipulated amounts to designated individuals. Plant funds are unexpended plant funds, funds for renewal and replacement, funds to retire indebtedness, and investment in plant. Agency funds are used to maintain a record of monies held in a fiduciary way for other parties. Loan funds account for loans made by the university granted to students to assist them in financing their education.
    Last edited by Panther100; 10-21-2015, 02:23 AM.

    Comment


    • Re: Full Cost of Attendance

      said it before and I'll say it again.
      the FCS missed the boat by not establishing a subdivision-wide regulation against CoA stipends in football.

      I'm guessing that 90% (at least) of FCS institutions would rather not have to come up with that additional expense to cover, but would prefer it to remain a level playing field (scholarship wise).

      Comment


      • Re: Full Cost of Attendance

        Originally posted by Panther100 View Post
        I understand recognition on a modified accrual basis, measurement focus, and means of spending and control. Fund balance reserve is a portion of fund equity that must be segregated for some future use and is not available for future appropriation. The reserve is not a liability, it is a reservation of fund balance. This has a few similarities to appropriation of retained earnings in an enterprise. If a portion of the fund balance is designated as reserved, the fund balance should be reported as unreserved fund balance. The restricted current funds is utilized by colleges to account for resources that are to be spent for current operating purposes. The unrestricted fund accounts for all currently expendable resources that are to be used in primary objectives of the institution such as research. Endowment funds are similar to the nonexpendable trust funds in state and local governments. The university would have to keep the principal of the gifts in tact. Term endowments are like endowment funds except that the principal may be spent after a period of time following the occurrence of an event. Quasi endowment records unrestricted monetary balances that have been voluntarily been set aside by the university rather than applied to current operations. Annuity funds consist of funds acquired by the institution subject to agreements where the assets are made available to the school with the condition the institution binds itself to pay stipulated amounts to designated individuals. Plant funds are unexpended plant funds, funds for renewal and replacement, funds to retire indebtedness, and investment in plant. Agency funds are used to maintain a record of monies held in a fiduciary way for other parties. Loan funds account for loans made by the university granted to students to assist them in financing their education.
        You pulled that from Wikipedia...
        "Another six or seven years and 1988 will be made to feel slightly unwelcome, I'm sure."

        Quote from Newsbreaker, mark the time 10:47pm, August 31, 2014.

        Comment


        • Re: Full Cost of Attendance

          Originally posted by 1988 View Post
          You pulled that from Wikipedia...
          No, read a book for once.

          Comment


          • Re: Full Cost of Attendance

            Originally posted by vbfan19 View Post
            said it before and I'll say it again.
            the FCS missed the boat by not establishing a subdivision-wide regulation against CoA stipends in football.

            I'm guessing that 90% (at least) of FCS institutions would rather not have to come up with that additional expense to cover, but would prefer it to remain a level playing field (scholarship wise).
            This with an amended 98% figure. Those wanting it are fbs-to-be's giving it a trial run

            Comment


            • Re: Full Cost of Attendance

              UNIDOME upgrade/FCOA. The new AD will have to decide if we are going to be bush league football or not. He/She should not be shocked if we lose without FCOA for football. The attendance will mirror performance.

              Comment


              • Re: Full Cost of Attendance

                Originally posted by Panther100 View Post
                UNIDOME upgrade/FCOA. The new AD will have to decide if we are going to be bush league football or not. He/She should not be shocked if we lose without FCOA for football. The attendance will mirror performance.
                False......

                Comment


                • Re: Full Cost of Attendance

                  Originally posted by Panther100 View Post
                  UNIDOME upgrade/FCOA. The new AD will have to decide if we are going to be bush league football or not. He/She should not be shocked if we lose without FCOA for football. The attendance will mirror performance.
                  I disagree. UNI has had some pretty good teams and attendance still is mediocre for most games. That is one of the reasons UNI won't (or shouldn't go) FBS. We have a fickle fan base and student support and that won't change with FCOA.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Full Cost of Attendance

                    Register may have a fit:

                    Number of times on Sports Illustrated cover:
                    Ben Jacobson coached teams = 2
                    UNI teams coached by everyone ban thinks is better = 0

                    Comment


                    • Re: Full Cost of Attendance

                      Originally posted by catsize View Post
                      Looking at numbers in a vacuum is fun. Helps to spark OUTRAGE!!!

                      Comment


                      • What a bush league editorial. Call out UNI for living in the slums of the valley and the $166 student fee but make no mention of the free season tickets. And then say that should be a top priority of the new AD.

                        Funny when I read the ISU and EIU sections, they said what a bargain it is to be able to BUY season tickets at a discounted rate. Then no mention of making it a top priority of the AD to remove the fees at those schools with all the extra revenue that the P5 conferences bring into those programs...

                        What a POS publication...

                        Sent from my SCH-R970 using Tapatalk
                        If computers ruled college basketball the way they do football, we'd have skipped all this March Madness monotony and just waited a month for the Kansas-Kentucky title game. And watched Northern Iowa play Cornell in the Poulan Weedeater Bowl. ~ Dwight Perry The Seattle Times

                        Comment


                        • Re: Full Cost of Attendance

                          Originally posted by UNIAlum95 View Post
                          What a bush league editorial. Call out UNI for living in the slums of the valley and the $166 student fee but make no mention of the free season tickets. And then say that should be a top priority of the new AD.

                          Funny when I read the ISU and EIU sections, they said what a bargain it is to be able to BUY season tickets at a discounted rate. Then no mention of making it a top priority of the AD to remove the fees at those schools with all the extra revenue that the P5 conferences bring into those programs...
                          You must have read a different article than I did, as the one I saw called for the ending of student athletic fees at ALL schools.

                          But it didn't really cover the fact that such a move would be far more feasible at P5 schools like UI and ISU due to the obscene amount of cash they get from their media contracts.

                          Comment


                          • Re: Full Cost of Attendance

                            Typical register half-assed job. Assuming the numbers they reported were accurate (and that is a huge and dangerous assumption as they almost never get numbers right in any article), bottom line of the article is UNI students pay $166 for all sports admission, ISU students pay $312, and UI students pay ???, oh they failed to report how much UI students pay for athletic tickets so no comparison can be made. I would bet it's more than at ISU.

                            Fine, do away with the student fee and charge students $60 for a football season ticket and $140 for basketball. If they don't buy season tickets they are free to buy individual game tickets at the public rate.

                            Further reduction in size of the student sections would probably be required.
                            GO PANTHERS!

                            Comment


                            • Re: Full Cost of Attendance

                              Originally posted by GonzoCat View Post
                              Typical register half-assed job. Assuming the numbers they reported were accurate (and that is a huge and dangerous assumption as they almost never get numbers right in any article), bottom line of the article is UNI students pay $166 for all sports admission, ISU students pay $312, and UI students pay ???, oh they failed to report how much UI students pay for athletic tickets so no comparison can be made. I would bet it's more than at ISU.

                              Fine, do away with the student fee and charge students $60 for a football season ticket and $140 for basketball. If they don't buy season tickets they are free to buy individual game tickets at the public rate.

                              Further reduction in size of the student sections would probably be required.
                              We don't fill student sections now when they don't have to pay extra to get in. Forcing them to buy separately, we might as well only reserve the first few rows.
                              Number of times on Sports Illustrated cover:
                              Ben Jacobson coached teams = 2
                              UNI teams coached by everyone ban thinks is better = 0

                              Comment


                              • Re: Full Cost of Attendance

                                The article isn't without merrit. There's a lot of students that get nothing for their $166 subsidy to athletics. But there's plenty of other fees in that category as well (health fee, health facility fee, recreation fee).

                                When discussing the 3 state schools it was bad journalism to not point out that UNI students get into athletic events free and that the fee covers more than just athletics.

                                Actually where did they get $166? This show's it's $50. This money goes to more than just athletics as well.


                                And UNI's reliance on general funds for athletics are not because of facilities or high paid coaching contracts. It's because of Women's sports.
                                "I think they're very good," Farley said of the preseason top 25 Hawkeyes. "But so are we."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X