Brett Mcmakin

[run&blade]

Re: Brett Mcmakin

Farley would bench Tom Brady if he could convince Adrian Petersen to come to uni and play QB.

[claw]

Brett Mcmakin

Brett wasn't going to play for UNI next year no matter of he decided to give the NFL a go or not

It has nothing to do with any ill will with the coaches. Farley didn't do anything or chase him off.

Let's put it that way and move on to kids who will be on the roster

[SteinPizza]

Re: Brett Mcmakin

Brett wasn't going to play for UNI next year no matter of he decided to give the NFL a go or not

It has nothing to do with any ill will with the coaches. Farley didn't do anything or chase him off.

Let's put it that way and move on to kids who will be on the roster

That's what I was alluding to and guessing at above. Whatever the reason, it happens. Both sides move on and turn the page.

[Born-a-Panther]

Re: Brett Mcmakin

Brett wasn't going to play for UNI next year no matter of he decided to give the NFL a go or not

It has nothing to do with any ill will with the coaches. Farley didn't do anything or chase him off.

Let's put it that way and move on to kids who will be on the roster

Thank you. Let's stop speculating that the coaches did something. Onward and upward. It's January. I'm already excited for spring ball.

[Gocats15]

Re: Brett Mcmakin

Brett wasn't going to play for UNI next year no matter of he decided to give the NFL a go or not

It has nothing to do with any ill will with the coaches. Farley didn't do anything or chase him off.

Let's put it that way and move on to kids who will be on the roster

I had a feeling this was the case. The fact that he wasn't going to comment or doing interviews kind seemed odd.

[dan_beeding]

Re: Brett Mcmakin

Isn't speculation exactly what a message board is for? For us that are NOT in the know to have fun trying to figure it out. The fact that a few of you know what is going on does not end the rest of our curiosity.

[panther1]

Re: Brett Mcmakin

So this must be an academic decision based on reading between all the lines from those who don't want to name the reason. That's too bad.

[claw]

Re: Brett Mcmakin

So this must be an academic decision based on reading between all the lines from those who don't want to name the reason. That's too bad.

Nothing to do with coaches, academics, or potential draft position. That leaves 1 other thing it could have been. As far as I know he was set to graduate anyway.

[Trapped in California]

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/50/87/d2/5087d2052c9902379a5fc16c4ec3ff2e.jpg

From my NSA monitored nexus 5

[Trapped in California]

That one was for Jeremiah Davis #teamjay

From my NSA monitored nexus 5

[Gocats15]

Re: Brett Mcmakin

Nothing to do with coaches, academics, or potential draft position. That leaves 1 other thing it could have been. As far as I know he was set to graduate anyway.

So did Farley not tell the team that the NCAA randomly tests at playoff games? And what the penalties are for those tests? Or did he just ignore it? Smh I just don't understand how you could let that happen.

[Todd Tharp]

Re: Brett Mcmakin

Nothing to do with coaches, academics, or potential draft position. That leaves 1 other thing it could have been. As far as I know he was set to graduate anyway.

For those of us not close enough to the situation to read between the lines, what exactly happened here?

[claw]

Re: Brett Mcmakin

So did Farley not tell the team that the NCAA randomly tests at playoff games? And what the penalties are for those tests? Or did he just ignore it? Smh I just don't understand how you could let that happen.

http://webs.wichita.edu/depttools/de...ting%20FAQ.pdf

As far as I know "street drugs" are between 1-4 games. Anabolic are a year long.

10-15 days to get results back. Appeal process 10-15 days.

Team was late leaving Portland (on 12/6) due to NCAA drug tests, allegedly.

Anyone starting to 2 and 2 together on this one?

[Trapped in California]

Leaving late to drug test collection would be a matter of a shy bladder (actual government term) - i.e. not being able to urinate enough for sample size required.

The tests are done at an off-site lab, on half million dollar machines. Negatives are usually returned next business day. Positives take longer but usually within 2-3 days. This is default process for testing for recreational drugs. Can't speak directly to steroid testing, but the process would be similar, maybe blood based.

So, normally a player's test results would be finalized before the game next week. It does, however depend on the protocols put in place to confirm positive results, which can cause further delays.

Brett played in Fargo, so would think this proposed situation is not the answer. That said, anything is possible in this world.



From my NSA monitored nexus 5

[Gocats15]

Re: Brett Mcmakin

http://webs.wichita.edu/depttools/de...ting%20FAQ.pdf

As far as I know "street drugs" are between 1-4 games. Anabolic are a year long.

10-15 days to get results back. Appeal process 10-15 days.

Team was late leaving Portland (on 12/6) due to NCAA drug tests, allegedly.

Anyone starting to 2 and 2 together on this one?

That article is from 2012. They've made a few changes recently, and they test at every postseason game I believe. It can result in a half year suspension now for street drugs and anything considered performance enhancing is one full year. Darren Carrington for Oregon got suspended last year for the National Championship and half of this year for failing a test at the Rose Bowl.