Happy Holidays to all -- here are the MVC Power Rankings for December 19 -
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Valley Power Rankings - December 19
Collapse
X
-
Valley Power Rankings - December 19
For the most in-depth coverage of the Missouri Valley, visit http://www.examiner.com/missouri-val...al/joseph-book
Follow me on twitter at http://twitter.com/mvcexaminerjoeTags: None
-
Re: Valley Power Rankings - December 19
What strikes me is that the conference is top heavy - looking at the W/L
The bottom 3 teams have 49% of the conferences losses, and the bottom 4 teams have 62% of the conference's losses coming into this week.
Comment
-
Re: Valley Power Rankings - December 19
Honestly, that's a GREAT thing. When the Valley was getting multiple NCAA bids, there were some really horrendous teams at the bottom of the conference. Parity is great and all, but the MVC is MUCH better served having a few really good teams and a few really bad teams.Originally posted by clenz View PostWhat strikes me is that the conference is top heavy - looking at the W/L
The bottom 3 teams have 49% of the conferences losses, and the bottom 4 teams have 62% of the conference's losses coming into this week.Originally posted by rockybisonYou guys suck so bad. Please never let me come back. Ya had 20 yrs by yourself and ya fckd it up. SU rolls in and does it in 4, prolly next year too. Living in a shadow is killn ya.
Comment
-
Re: Valley Power Rankings - December 19
"Drake (6-4)- The Bulldogs couldn’t complete the Valley sweep of lowly Iowa, losing by 14 in Iowa City."
That one made me smile.
Give us a yell, HO! The purple and the gold
Victory for U-N-I!
Find out what the other team wants to do, then take it away from them.
- George Halas
Comment
-
Re: Valley Power Rankings - December 19
Completely agree - except it would be better that the teams at the bottom of the conference could have won a few more non-conf games to make the overal conference look better. Once we get into conference play, they can bottom feed all they like.Originally posted by Casey'sitsallgood View PostHonestly, that's a GREAT thing. When the Valley was getting multiple NCAA bids, there were some really horrendous teams at the bottom of the conference. Parity is great and all, but the MVC is MUCH better served having a few really good teams and a few really bad teams.It's about time we make the McLeod LOUD!
Comment
-
Re: Valley Power Rankings - December 19
right... we want some seperation in league play. Ideally we would want even the "bottom feeders" in conference play to have good non-con records.Originally posted by TommyT View PostCompletely agree - except it would be better that the teams at the bottom of the conference could have won a few more non-conf games to make the overal conference look better. Once we get into conference play, they can bottom feed all they like."I think they're very good," Farley said of the preseason top 25 Hawkeyes. "But so are we."
Comment



Comment