WWW.PANTHERNATION.COM
GO PANTHERS!
welcome

Welcome to the best UNI Panther forum on the net!

Become a PN Supporting Member! Get exclusive access to the Panther Den forum and more. Click here for info.

30-minute show exclusively highlighting UNI Athletics. Click here for info.

  • You need to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
  • To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the help page by clicking this link.
  • If you have any questions please use the Contact Us form.
This website is not affiliated with the University of Northern Iowa or the UNI Panther Athletic Program.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Looking at 2015-2016

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

    If McDonnell is ready to play he needs to play. The 4 spot is the biggest question to me.

    Yeh PJ can play there but he;s a SG and the most consistent 3 point shooter on the team. Also Carlson is very green at that position.

    I'm not sure why anyone thinks Dahl needs to play, got two true post sophomores. Uni doesn't get big guys like that all the time, a red shirt year to work on speed of the game will work wonders when he's a junior and senior.

    Comment


    • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

      10-11 man rotations cause matchup problems for the opponent and saves the legs for St. Louis. Eight man rotations are too easy to figure out and don't save the legs. Case in point is the 93-94 team. Even the great Eldon Miller could only do so much vs SIU in the MVC Final.

      Comment


      • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

        Originally posted by unipanther2154 View Post
        This is true but you also have to ask yourself if we get players who can play as true freshmen based only off talent. We get some from time to time but some of those have to play some just for bodies. You don't play a guy just to get him out the door quicker and a new guy in. Until we start getting higher talented players (at the time of high school graduation) it would hurt our program to not be red shirting. We are a program who gets kids who are in need of development...that's who we are. If we as a program want to take the next step then yeah, we need to get these types of kids who are ready from day one. A type of kid who has offers from medium level high major conference schools and chooses UNI. Once that's starts happening I think we will be in a great place.
        I'm not against red shirting. Injuries, academic issues, and family emergencies happen. Yes, we almost never land three star athletes. I have been an investor for almost thirty years. I have made it work thru a trading system. I learned by doing. The same holds true for BB. In my playing days in H/S it was next to impossible to learn anything sitting down.

        Comment


        • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

          We have no chance in St. Louis without 10 guys. Probably need 11. WSU has been beating down teams for years this way. The season is riding on the MVC Tourney Title.
          Last edited by Panther100; 10-01-2015, 02:02 PM.

          Comment


          • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

            Originally posted by Panther100 View Post
            I'm not against red shirting. Injuries, academic issues, and family emergencies happen. Yes, we almost never land three star athletes. I have been an investor for almost thirty years. I have made it work thru a trading system. I learned by doing. The same holds true for BB. In my playing days in H/S it was next to impossible to learn anything sitting down.
            You seem to miss probably the most important thing, Physical presence. You can be 6'8 and 195lbs all day behind a desk....not so if you're playing D1 basketball and expected to play the post. A year of weight lifting without question can make a huge difference.

            Comment


            • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

              This is a little off topic. I would be in favor of a 24 second shot clock with two twenty minute halves. I would keep the schedule at 31 games. The scholarship limit should be raised to 14. This would better prepare athletes for the pro game. This would create more educational opportunity. The costs would be higher. The budget issues would be more challenging.

              Comment


              • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

                Originally posted by Panther100 View Post
                This is a little off topic. I would be in favor of a 24 second shot clock with two twenty minute halves. I would keep the schedule at 31 games. The scholarship limit should be raised to 14. This would better prepare athletes for the pro game. This would create more educational opportunity. The costs would be higher. The budget issues would be more challenging.
                Should not raise the scholarship limit. All that means is you have one or two top recruits sitting on Power 5 benches that could help schools like UNI. It would really dry up our recruiting in my opinion.

                Comment


                • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

                  Originally posted by BCPanther View Post
                  Was waiting for this.

                  This means nothing. Two like minded programs are playing a scrimmage. There is nothing more to it. Bo Ryan has changed his mind on retiring this year and has said repeatedly that he wants Greg Gard to get the job.

                  It's just two teams meeting at UD to get better and get ready for the grind.
                  It just makes me think. Shows that Jake has connections at Wisconsin, whether is just be Bo or not, and mutual respect between the two. Not saying it's going to happen, food for thought. I've said for a while the only job that worries me for Jake is Wisconsin, maybe it's just my own thought. Also, the coach can say who he wants to follow him, that doesn't mean anything in the long run though.

                  Lastly, you mention UD, is this at the University of Dubuque? My wife works there, maybe I can sneak into the gym for the afternoon, lol.
                  Last edited by CyCarp; 09-30-2015, 07:39 PM.
                  To avoid confusion - my username is baseball (Cy Young award) related, NOT for the Cyclones.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

                    Yep, last I heard is that Robbie Sieverding is giving them the gym there so that neither one has to travel the whole way.

                    Selfishly, I hope this turns into real games with Bucky down the road.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

                      Originally posted by BCPanther View Post

                      Selfishly, I hope this turns into real games with Bucky down the road.
                      This would be great!
                      "I think they're very good," Farley said of the preseason top 25 Hawkeyes. "But so are we."

                      Comment


                      • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

                        Originally posted by unipanther2154 View Post
                        You seem to miss probably the most important thing, Physical presence. You can be 6'8 and 195lbs all day behind a desk....not so if you're playing D1 basketball and expected to play the post. A year of weight lifting without question can make a huge difference.
                        There are 2 star guys 6' 9" 215 lbs. eg. McDonnell. NCAA bids combined with top quality education eg. schools of business/education equals three star athletes. The NIT should be the very minimum goal. I agree our coaches do an excellent job at developing. This leads to the 2/3 star athletes competing against the blue chippers. True, the blue chippers usually win. The trick is to learn from it.
                        Last edited by Panther100; 10-01-2015, 02:00 PM.

                        Comment


                        • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

                          Originally posted by r54uni View Post
                          Should not raise the scholarship limit. All that means is you have one or two top recruits sitting on Power 5 benches that could help schools like UNI. It would really dry up our recruiting in my opinion.
                          Yeah, the idea wasn't the best money/recruiting wise. I'm in favor of opportunity and development. The 14 scholarships was in case of more injuries.
                          Last edited by Panther100; 09-30-2015, 10:39 PM.

                          Comment


                          • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

                            Originally posted by Panther100 View Post
                            Less red shirting equals more recruiting. More red shirting equals less recruiting.
                            This is a true statement and a reason for us to continue to look at redshirting players as we can.

                            More recruiting also means more money needed for recruiting budgets. Yes, we keep finding ways to increase the budget for the staff, but if we can maximize the dollars we spend, it's better. No reason to overspend unnecessarily.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

                              Increasing the max # of scholarships for any sport would hurt not help UNI.
                              "I think they're very good," Farley said of the preseason top 25 Hawkeyes. "But so are we."

                              Comment


                              • Re: Looking at 2015-2016

                                Originally posted by Khan4Cats View Post
                                This is a true statement and a reason for us to continue to look at redshirting players as we can.

                                More recruiting also means more money needed for recruiting budgets. Yes, we keep finding ways to increase the budget for the staff, but if we can maximize the dollars we spend, it's better. No reason to overspend unnecessarily.
                                I realize our endowment is under $100 million. We're not sitting on 7 losses heading to St. Louis. Not playing 10 guys equals 12+ losses and rolled up basketballs on Spring Break.
                                Last edited by Panther100; 10-01-2015, 01:36 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X