WWW.PANTHERNATION.COM
GO PANTHERS!
welcome

Welcome to the best UNI Panther forum on the net!

Become a PN Supporting Member! Get exclusive access to the Panther Den forum and more. Click here for info.

30-minute show exclusively highlighting UNI Athletics. Click here for info.

  • You need to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
  • To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the help page by clicking this link.
  • If you have any questions please use the Contact Us form.
This website is not affiliated with the University of Northern Iowa or the UNI Panther Athletic Program.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Next up: Northern Colorado

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Gboom23 View Post
    They did...

    response starts at 6:10 mark here.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/UNImbb/st...02203577081858
    I might be reading a bit too much into it, but it almost seems like he's disappointed in himself for those rotations. Like, that "Yeaaaaaah..." when the reporter is asking the question is classic "I know I messed up, let me explain."

    Comment


    • #92
      Or it could have been disappointment/frustration that they didn't hold a 10-16 point lead, which could have led to them feeling more comfortable to rotate some new guys in for a few minutes. "Yeaaaaaah...that was the plan, but.." kind of thing.

      Comment


      • #93
        The second half lack of substitutions drives me nuts sometimes. It sounded like coach Jake was disappointed he didn't use Ty much in the 2nd half. His logic seemed to be they were hard to defend so he couldn't sub, but Ty is probably the 2nd best defender and he road the bench. I feel like this roster good enough to spread the minutes out more. I hope Jake develops more trust in those 7-10 guys in the rotation this year and we see some hockey style line changes again.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by desertcat View Post
          The second half lack of substitutions drives me nuts sometimes. It sounded like coach Jake was disappointed he didn't use Ty much in the 2nd half. His logic seemed to be they were hard to defend so he couldn't sub, but Ty is probably the 2nd best defender and he road the bench. I feel like this roster good enough to spread the minutes out more. I hope Jake develops more trust in those 7-10 guys in the rotation this year and we see some hockey style line changes again.
          But who do you put Ty in for there? Za is the best defender, Ty isn't going to play the 4, and Spencer was having the best game of his career.

          Comment


          • #95
            Green needed a rest. I’m still excited for his promise, but he’s got a negative +/- for this year. Still should a lot of time. But also some rest.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by sevelev711 View Post

              I might be reading a bit too much into it, but it almost seems like he's disappointed in himself for those rotations. Like, that "Yeaaaaaah..." when the reporter is asking the question is classic "I know I messed up, let me explain."
              Maybe he wants his starters to get accustomed to playing fatigued. And to find out how much fatigue affects their game.

              Comment

              Working...
              X