Originally posted by Panthers to the Bone
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
7 Freshmen
Collapse
X
-
Agreed, and perhaps that's the most valuable thing a Eglseder and Koch bring...keeping our big guns fresh. Last season, we pretty much played 6 guys, occasionally Travo got meaningfull minutes, but for the most part Mac only played 6 and it killed us late in the season. Nice point.
-
-
Originally posted by UNI MadCat View PostI pointed those three examples out because they were neat stories of finding a "diamond in the rough". Gee, lets see... do I really believe that this is the SOLE reason for having walk-ons? Because every once in awhile one might turn out to be a stud? No. But thanks for playing.
That's far from the main reason walk-ons are so valuable. The reasons are what I clearly stated prior to that. Teams are only going to be as good as their walk-ons and practice players. These people are the get down and dirty guys that get no credit but who week in and week out are preparing the main guys for their next battle. If these guys dont give 150% (and expect little in return) then our boys won't be ready.
I just think its ridiculous for anyone to ever say anything against a walk-on.
They are the lifeblood of any good athletic program.
Please don't put words in my mouth.. Did I ever say that you believed "that this is the SOLE reason for having walk-ons?" because I dont recall ever saying that at all and i sure never said that in my post.
The first half of my post was agreeing with you about walk ons and if you would have said they were just inspirational stories then i wouldnt have disagreed with them at all. However, your post read as though you were using these couple stories as PART of your argument (notice I never said the "SOLE" part of your argument). So, i simply said I didnt think they helped our argument against those who were bashing walk ons. I never once said you thought it was the "sole" reason for having walk-ons, i just said i didnt think it was relevant to the debate...
If you meant them as inspirational stories and not as part of the debate, AWESOME! I love to hear the stories too and wasnt bashing how great they were.. just make sure you point that out so they dont appear to be part of your argumentLast edited by pantherfan4ever; 12-12-2006, 03:33 PM.John 3:16
Comment
-
I've noticed that the great thing about Eglseder is the touch he has on the free throw line. This will be big. It will be nice to know when he gets fouled and goes to the line, he's not throwing up a brick. Maybe he can be a "jason reece" at the line-that guy could convert...overall, the freshman group will be exciting. A lot of untapped potential.
Comment
-
I've made the same obsevation about Jordon. For a big man, he's got really good form at the free throw line. That's a good thing for a guy who's going to be doing some banging around under the basket. If he can't get the hoop, at least get to the line for 2.Originally posted by Catnep View PostI've noticed that the great thing about Eglseder is the touch he has on the free throw line. This will be big. It will be nice to know when he gets fouled and goes to the line, he's not throwing up a brick. Maybe he can be a "jason reece" at the line-that guy could convert...overall, the freshman group will be exciting. A lot of untapped potential."They keep saying that what really matters is not whether you win or lose, but how you played the game. The trouble is that the best way to determine how you played the game is by whether you won or lost." - Anonymous
Comment
-
He seems to be fairly good about drawing fouls too... so when he finally gets those easy buckets to fall (which will start to fall for him as he continues to get more comfortable) and he gets to the FT line, he will be pretty dangerous for sure!Originally posted by Big Cats View PostI've made the same obsevation about Jordon. For a big man, he's got really good form at the free throw line. That's a good thing for a guy who's going to be doing some banging around under the basket. If he can't get the hoop, at least get to the line for 2.John 3:16
Comment



Comment