WWW.PANTHERNATION.COM
GO PANTHERS!
welcome

Welcome to the best UNI Panther forum on the net!

Become a PN Supporting Member! Get exclusive access to the Panther Den forum and more. Click here for info.

30-minute show exclusively highlighting UNI Athletics. Click here for info.

  • You need to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
  • To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
  • If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the help page by clicking this link.
  • If you have any questions please use the Contact Us form.
This website is not affiliated with the University of Northern Iowa or the UNI Panther Athletic Program.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Keeping an eye on the national rankings

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I've always thought a top 25 ranking is more of a distraction than anything else at this point in the season. I'd rather be snubbed and use it as motivation until the end of the year.

    Comment


    • #17
      It would get some butts in the seats, though, which would be nice.

      Comment


      • #18
        The Colorado voter didn’t even include us.

        AP Top 25 ballot: 1. @ZagMBB 2. tOSU 3. KU 4. Ducks 5. Ville 6. Duke 7. Butler 8. Baylor 9. Sparty 10. Mich 11. Nova 12. SDSU 13. FSU 14. Memp 15. Iowa 16. Auburn 17. Penn St 18. UW 19. Utah St 20. UVa 21. Terps 22. BYU 23. Dayton 24. St Mary's 25. Wichita St (WCC+MWC w/ five)

        Comment


        • #19
          Didn't include CU either so at least there's that

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by sevelev711 View Post
            It would get some butts in the seats, though, which would be nice.
            That is one HUGE piece people over look. When I worked in college athletics a top 25 ranking was huge for attendance and buzz around the program grew 2 fold. For a mid major is makes it even more of a big deal. It also gets their game highlights on ESPN and other national tv shows which in turn helps recruiting and surprisingly helps enrollment at UNI because of more exposure. The national exposure also helps bring attention to the team for the NCAA tournament committee and helps with an at large bid and seeding. Lots of good comes with a top 25 ranking!

            Comment


            • #21
              It's fun to see UNI's score in the top 25 ticker on the sports channels.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by rhoho View Post

                That is one HUGE piece people over look. When I worked in college athletics a top 25 ranking was huge for attendance and buzz around the program grew 2 fold. For a mid major is makes it even more of a big deal. It also gets their game highlights on ESPN and other national tv shows which in turn helps recruiting and surprisingly helps enrollment at UNI because of more exposure. The national exposure also helps bring attention to the team for the NCAA tournament committee and helps with an at large bid and seeding. Lots of good comes with a top 25 ranking!
                The first part is true although I'm not sure I agree with the last statement. The committee never misses a chance to discriminate against a mid major, ranking or no ranking.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by orangetennis View Post

                  The first part is true although I'm not sure I agree with the last statement. The committee never misses a chance to discriminate against a mid major, ranking or no ranking.
                  Hopefully the committee punishes teams with weak non-con schedule.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by enkamania View Post

                    Hopefully the committee punishes teams with weak non-con schedule.
                    That won't happen. They'll look at the "entire body of work," which will include their conference schedule. It's one of the major reasons P5 schools don't schedule tough non conference games, because they don't have to. They know they'll get all they need in conference to "prove" themselves to the committee.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by orangetennis View Post

                      The first part is true although I'm not sure I agree with the last statement. The committee never misses a chance to discriminate against a mid major, ranking or no ranking.
                      Yea, didn't Murray St 2 or 3 years ago go into their conference tourney ranked - then they lost the championship and got snubbed?
                      To avoid confusion - my username is baseball (Cy Young award) related, NOT for the Cyclones.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by CyCarp View Post

                        Yea, didn't Murray St 2 or 3 years ago go into their conference tourney ranked - then they lost the championship and got snubbed?
                        2014-15 season. Best win out of conference was Illinois state. Their OOC strength of schedule was horrible

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Being ranked doesn't help with enrollment. UNI's enrollment is at a 40 year low and it's not because we haven't been ranked lately.
                          GO PANTHERS!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by GonzoCat View Post
                            Being ranked doesn't help with enrollment. UNI's enrollment is at a 40 year low and it's not because we haven't been ranked lately.
                            Of course that's not the reason enrollment is down, but to think successful athletics (maybe not just being ranked) doesn't help is just silly.
                            To avoid confusion - my username is baseball (Cy Young award) related, NOT for the Cyclones.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by CyCarp View Post

                              Of course that's not the reason enrollment is down, but to think successful athletics (maybe not just being ranked) doesn't help is just silly.
                              Enrollment made a huge jump after the sweet 16 season

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                We started our run of NCAA tournaments in 2004, sweet 16 was 2010.

                                UNI enrollment per the Rod Library website:
                                • 2004 . . . . 12824
                                • 2005 . . . . 12513
                                • 2006 . . . . 12260
                                • 2007 . . . . 12609
                                • 2008 . . . . 12908
                                • 2009 . . . . 13080
                                • 2010 . . . . 13201
                                • 2011 . . . . 13168
                                • 2012 . . . . 12273
                                • 2013 . . . . 12159
                                • 2014 . . . . 11928
                                • 2015 . . . . 11981
                                • 2016 . . . . 11905
                                • 2017 . . . . 11907

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X