This sucks, it really does, but I find little or no fault in what any of these 3 have done (or presumably done to this point).
1. Doug
I don't blame the kid for wanting to play for his father, a relatively successful Division I men's basketball coach. His mother will not have to choose between attending his game's or his father's. He won't have to compete against his father on a regular basis. His other family members can attend each and every one of his games as well as his father's. Its a unique opportunity that I think would be very hard to pass up.
I think all of this was trumped by the mess in Ames. Doug knew his dad was a lame duck in Ames, and the program in general was struggling. At that point, it made all the sense in the world to come to UNI. Circumstances have changed in a way that he couldn't have imagined at the time. He still gets to play for a great program, with tons of support, and he gets to play for his father.
2. Mac
I don't blame Mac for taking the ISU job. He got his shot, got paid well for it, and it didn't work out. CU isn't a bad consolation prize.
I certainly don't blame Mac for jumping ship at ISU this time to take a more stable position at CU. I don't blame him for wanting to coach his son, and for wanting Doug and his wife to share the experience at CU with him.
I don't blame him for not wanting to face his son 2-3 times a year if it can be avoided, and I don't blame him for wanting to see his son play for 4 years. I certainly don't think he is forcing his son to do anything here, something that some of you are implying.
I won't be cheering for him, and I don't expect you to either. But I have a hard time believing that this somehow makes him a bad person.
3. Jake
I'm assuming for the moment that Jake is supporting a decision to release Doug from his LOI without sitting out.
A commit comes to Jake, and says that he no longer wishes to play for UNI, but would rather play for his father. In this case, the circumstances are far different than they were when Doug signed his LOI. What is Jake supposed to do? Try to force the kid to stay at UNI? Attempt to hurt this kid's career by forcing him to sit a couple of years?
This is an extremely unique situation, and I think it would be misguided to say things like "Jake needs to make this decision as a basketball coach, and not as a friend" or "Jake has to do what's best for UNI." He is doing both.
There is zero doubt in my mind that Jake has and will continue to put UNI first. I think he is doing so in this case by recognizing that he wants players who can invest 100% of their heart in UNI, and by recognizing that this is an extremely unique situation that does not create a slippery slope.
Jake and UNI gain very little by trying to force this kid to sit out a couple of years, or by trying to force his hand to stay at UNI.
1. Doug
I don't blame the kid for wanting to play for his father, a relatively successful Division I men's basketball coach. His mother will not have to choose between attending his game's or his father's. He won't have to compete against his father on a regular basis. His other family members can attend each and every one of his games as well as his father's. Its a unique opportunity that I think would be very hard to pass up.
I think all of this was trumped by the mess in Ames. Doug knew his dad was a lame duck in Ames, and the program in general was struggling. At that point, it made all the sense in the world to come to UNI. Circumstances have changed in a way that he couldn't have imagined at the time. He still gets to play for a great program, with tons of support, and he gets to play for his father.
2. Mac
I don't blame Mac for taking the ISU job. He got his shot, got paid well for it, and it didn't work out. CU isn't a bad consolation prize.
I certainly don't blame Mac for jumping ship at ISU this time to take a more stable position at CU. I don't blame him for wanting to coach his son, and for wanting Doug and his wife to share the experience at CU with him.
I don't blame him for not wanting to face his son 2-3 times a year if it can be avoided, and I don't blame him for wanting to see his son play for 4 years. I certainly don't think he is forcing his son to do anything here, something that some of you are implying.
I won't be cheering for him, and I don't expect you to either. But I have a hard time believing that this somehow makes him a bad person.
3. Jake
I'm assuming for the moment that Jake is supporting a decision to release Doug from his LOI without sitting out.
A commit comes to Jake, and says that he no longer wishes to play for UNI, but would rather play for his father. In this case, the circumstances are far different than they were when Doug signed his LOI. What is Jake supposed to do? Try to force the kid to stay at UNI? Attempt to hurt this kid's career by forcing him to sit a couple of years?
This is an extremely unique situation, and I think it would be misguided to say things like "Jake needs to make this decision as a basketball coach, and not as a friend" or "Jake has to do what's best for UNI." He is doing both.
There is zero doubt in my mind that Jake has and will continue to put UNI first. I think he is doing so in this case by recognizing that he wants players who can invest 100% of their heart in UNI, and by recognizing that this is an extremely unique situation that does not create a slippery slope.
Jake and UNI gain very little by trying to force this kid to sit out a couple of years, or by trying to force his hand to stay at UNI.


Comment