Re: Next Year
Bradley has some money in the alumni base too. Their new coach, and recently loosing players, isn't the story here. They've been crap for the 10(?) years since their Sweet 16 run. They have some built in advantages that others don't, and a Sweet 16 is something you should build from. Inexcusible.
It could be that their adminstration places some of the same unrealistic academic thresholds as those at Drake, a similar school. Drake's President and AD can't be serious about winning, because they have ridiculously high academic standards that seriously hurt their recruiting. It's nice that 90% of their team carries a 3.0 or above, that their best player is on track to get a doctorate in pharmacy, etc. But, you can't be that picky and expect to attract the talent needed to be good. And, despite what some of you think, Drake is a good school.
Originally posted by PantherHawk
View Post
It could be that their adminstration places some of the same unrealistic academic thresholds as those at Drake, a similar school. Drake's President and AD can't be serious about winning, because they have ridiculously high academic standards that seriously hurt their recruiting. It's nice that 90% of their team carries a 3.0 or above, that their best player is on track to get a doctorate in pharmacy, etc. But, you can't be that picky and expect to attract the talent needed to be good. And, despite what some of you think, Drake is a good school.


. Mine won't be one of those, because there is some some logic to some of your points. 




Comment