Originally posted by GoPanthers85
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2023-24 Basketball Schedule
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by BCPanther View Post
22 league games is a disaster. All you're doing is guaranteeing the league 12 more losses and a greatly reduced chance at an at large when those chances are already slimmer than they were. Going to 18 makes more sense than 22.
Comment
-
At the end of the day, we need teams at the top of the Valley standings to win non conference games. Drake got an at large last year and their non conference was trash.To avoid confusion - my username is baseball (Cy Young award) related, NOT for the Cyclones.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CyCarp View PostAt the end of the day, we need teams at the top of the Valley standings to win non conference games. Drake got an at large last year and their non conference was trash.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BrockLesnar View Post
Sixteen team league with 22 games is better due to less non-conference travel. Our league is not good enough to get at large bids to either the Dance or NIT most seasons.The unfortunate part is it won't happen because the four new schools would not make us any better. So, the A10, MWC, WCC will continue to lap us. Meanwhile, the MAC, ASUN, Conference USA, and a few others have passed us by too. We're stuck with this marginal one bid league.
So, your theory is we should expand but not with teams that could possibly help us get more bids so that we're splitting the money from that one bid more ways while playing more games against teams that aren't good enough to get in the tournament? Do I have that right?
If Bradley wins one game against the better part of their schedule (while Mast was out) they are squarely on the bubble with a shot. Had Drake not pooped the bed against Richmond they would have been on the bubble.
It's all stacked against our level at this point but, even in a downish year, the league was really close to having legitimate at large chances.#MACtion
- Likes 1
Comment
-
B4A seems like a great opportunity to get some wins against teams that might start slow, but who's NET will keep rising throughout the season.
A lot of things have to fall in place and some luck will be required, but Jake has once again put UNI in a position to be a possible at-large team, and that's all you can really ask of him from a scheduling perspective.__________________
The McLoud Center -Bob Lutz, Wichita Eagle, 2/3/2010
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by BrockLesnar View Post
Sixteen team league with 22 games is better due to less non-conference travel. Our league is not good enough to get at large bids to either the Dance or NIT most seasons.The unfortunate part is it won't happen because the four new schools would not make us any better. So, the A10, MWC, WCC will continue to lap us. Meanwhile, the MAC, ASUN, Conference USA, and a few others have passed us by too. We're stuck with this marginal one bid league.
Pure nonsense. Stop your silly.Last edited by UNIChippewa; 03-22-2023, 08:45 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by UNIpanther99 View PostB4A seems like a great opportunity to get some wins against teams that might start slow, but who's NET will keep rising throughout the season.
A lot of things have to fall in place and some luck will be required, but Jake has once again put UNI in a position to be a possible at-large team, and that's all you can really ask of him from a scheduling perspective.#MACtion
Comment
-
Originally posted by BCPanther View Post
Literally none of that is correct.
So, your theory is we should expand but not with teams that could possibly help us get more bids so that we're splitting the money from that one bid more ways while playing more games against teams that aren't good enough to get in the tournament? Do I have that right?
If Bradley wins one game against the better part of their schedule (while Mast was out) they are squarely on the bubble with a shot. Had Drake not pooped the bed against Richmond they would have been on the bubble.
It's all stacked against our level at this point but, even in a downish year, the league was really close to having legitimate at large chances.
Comment
-
Originally posted by UNIChippewa View Post
Give me a break. The MAC, with their one team getting a 13 seed, and the ASUN, with their one team as a 14 seed, have passed by a league that had two teams in the dance two years ago, had a #10 seed last year, and a 12 seed this year.
Pure nonsense. Stop your silly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BrockLesnar View Post
The 10 seed from last season resides in the A10, now. Last season Drake was the very last at-large because the committee was incompetent. This season Drake was legit, but got seeded one line too high. They were really a 13 seed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wxcpanther View Post
They were pretty much universally projected to be a 12 seed. As far as the woulda coulda shoulda with Bradley, it's a much more reasonable game when you realize the number of injuries they had to deal with while in Cancun.
Comment
Comment